Ran black on branc
This commit is contained in:
Griatch
parent
6effb6f456
commit
4ea6209123
230 changed files with 7108 additions and 2395 deletions
|
|
@ -196,7 +196,9 @@ def perm(accessing_obj, accessed_obj, *args, **kwargs):
|
|||
|
||||
if account:
|
||||
# we have an account puppeting this object. We must check what perms it has
|
||||
perms_account_single = [p[:-1] if p.endswith("s") else p for p in perms_account]
|
||||
perms_account_single = [
|
||||
p[:-1] if p.endswith("s") else p for p in perms_account
|
||||
]
|
||||
hpos_account = [
|
||||
hpos
|
||||
for hpos, hperm in enumerate(_PERMISSION_HIERARCHY)
|
||||
|
|
@ -206,7 +208,9 @@ def perm(accessing_obj, accessed_obj, *args, **kwargs):
|
|||
|
||||
if not account or is_quell:
|
||||
# only get the object-level perms if there is no account or quelling
|
||||
perms_object_single = [p[:-1] if p.endswith("s") else p for p in perms_object]
|
||||
perms_object_single = [
|
||||
p[:-1] if p.endswith("s") else p for p in perms_object
|
||||
]
|
||||
hpos_object = [
|
||||
hpos
|
||||
for hpos, hperm in enumerate(_PERMISSION_HIERARCHY)
|
||||
|
|
@ -322,7 +326,9 @@ def pid(accessing_obj, accessed_obj, *args, **kwargs):
|
|||
|
||||
# this is more efficient than multiple if ... elif statments
|
||||
CF_MAPPING = {
|
||||
"eq": lambda val1, val2: val1 == val2 or str(val1) == str(val2) or float(val1) == float(val2),
|
||||
"eq": lambda val1, val2: val1 == val2
|
||||
or str(val1) == str(val2)
|
||||
or float(val1) == float(val2),
|
||||
"gt": lambda val1, val2: float(val1) > float(val2),
|
||||
"lt": lambda val1, val2: float(val1) < float(val2),
|
||||
"ge": lambda val1, val2: float(val1) >= float(val2),
|
||||
|
|
@ -588,7 +594,8 @@ def holds(accessing_obj, accessed_obj, *args, **kwargs):
|
|||
(
|
||||
True
|
||||
for obj in contents
|
||||
if obj.key.lower() == objid or objid in [al.lower() for al in obj.aliases.all()]
|
||||
if obj.key.lower() == objid
|
||||
or objid in [al.lower() for al in obj.aliases.all()]
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -218,7 +218,9 @@ class LockHandler(object):
|
|||
continue
|
||||
lock_funcs = []
|
||||
try:
|
||||
access_type, rhs = (part.strip() for part in raw_lockstring.split(":", 1))
|
||||
access_type, rhs = (
|
||||
part.strip() for part in raw_lockstring.split(":", 1)
|
||||
)
|
||||
except ValueError:
|
||||
logger.log_trace()
|
||||
return locks
|
||||
|
|
@ -230,13 +232,21 @@ class LockHandler(object):
|
|||
evalstring = re.sub(r"\b%s\b" % pattern, pattern.lower(), evalstring)
|
||||
nfuncs = len(funclist)
|
||||
for funcstring in funclist:
|
||||
funcname, rest = (part.strip().strip(")") for part in funcstring.split("(", 1))
|
||||
funcname, rest = (
|
||||
part.strip().strip(")") for part in funcstring.split("(", 1)
|
||||
)
|
||||
func = _LOCKFUNCS.get(funcname, None)
|
||||
if not callable(func):
|
||||
elist.append(_("Lock: lock-function '%s' is not available.") % funcstring)
|
||||
elist.append(
|
||||
_("Lock: lock-function '%s' is not available.") % funcstring
|
||||
)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
args = list(arg.strip() for arg in rest.split(",") if arg and "=" not in arg)
|
||||
kwargs = dict([arg.split("=", 1) for arg in rest.split(",") if arg and "=" in arg])
|
||||
args = list(
|
||||
arg.strip() for arg in rest.split(",") if arg and "=" not in arg
|
||||
)
|
||||
kwargs = dict(
|
||||
[arg.split("=", 1) for arg in rest.split(",") if arg and "=" in arg]
|
||||
)
|
||||
lock_funcs.append((func, args, kwargs))
|
||||
evalstring = evalstring.replace(funcstring, "%s")
|
||||
if len(lock_funcs) < nfuncs:
|
||||
|
|
@ -246,7 +256,9 @@ class LockHandler(object):
|
|||
evalstring = " ".join(_RE_OK.findall(evalstring))
|
||||
eval(evalstring % tuple(True for func in funclist), {}, {})
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
elist.append(_("Lock: definition '%s' has syntax errors.") % raw_lockstring)
|
||||
elist.append(
|
||||
_("Lock: definition '%s' has syntax errors.") % raw_lockstring
|
||||
)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
if access_type in locks:
|
||||
duplicates += 1
|
||||
|
|
@ -326,7 +338,9 @@ class LockHandler(object):
|
|||
# sanity checks
|
||||
for lockdef in lockdefs:
|
||||
if ":" not in lockdef:
|
||||
err = _("Lock: '{lockdef}' contains no colon (:).").format(lockdef=lockdef)
|
||||
err = _("Lock: '{lockdef}' contains no colon (:).").format(
|
||||
lockdef=lockdef
|
||||
)
|
||||
if validate_only:
|
||||
return False, err
|
||||
else:
|
||||
|
|
@ -335,7 +349,8 @@ class LockHandler(object):
|
|||
access_type, rhs = [part.strip() for part in lockdef.split(":", 1)]
|
||||
if not access_type:
|
||||
err = _(
|
||||
"Lock: '{lockdef}' has no access_type " "(left-side of colon is empty)."
|
||||
"Lock: '{lockdef}' has no access_type "
|
||||
"(left-side of colon is empty)."
|
||||
).format(lockdef=lockdef)
|
||||
if validate_only:
|
||||
return False, err
|
||||
|
|
@ -343,14 +358,18 @@ class LockHandler(object):
|
|||
self._log_error(err)
|
||||
return False
|
||||
if rhs.count("(") != rhs.count(")"):
|
||||
err = _("Lock: '{lockdef}' has mismatched parentheses.").format(lockdef=lockdef)
|
||||
err = _("Lock: '{lockdef}' has mismatched parentheses.").format(
|
||||
lockdef=lockdef
|
||||
)
|
||||
if validate_only:
|
||||
return False, err
|
||||
else:
|
||||
self._log_error(err)
|
||||
return False
|
||||
if not _RE_FUNCS.findall(rhs):
|
||||
err = _("Lock: '{lockdef}' has no valid lock functions.").format(lockdef=lockdef)
|
||||
err = _("Lock: '{lockdef}' has no valid lock functions.").format(
|
||||
lockdef=lockdef
|
||||
)
|
||||
if validate_only:
|
||||
return False, err
|
||||
else:
|
||||
|
|
@ -492,7 +511,9 @@ class LockHandler(object):
|
|||
)
|
||||
self.add(lockstring)
|
||||
|
||||
def check(self, accessing_obj, access_type, default=False, no_superuser_bypass=False):
|
||||
def check(
|
||||
self, accessing_obj, access_type, default=False, no_superuser_bypass=False
|
||||
):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Checks a lock of the correct type by passing execution off to
|
||||
the lock function(s).
|
||||
|
|
@ -540,7 +561,8 @@ class LockHandler(object):
|
|||
or (
|
||||
hasattr(accessing_obj, "get_account")
|
||||
and (
|
||||
not accessing_obj.get_account() or accessing_obj.get_account().is_superuser
|
||||
not accessing_obj.get_account()
|
||||
or accessing_obj.get_account().is_superuser
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
):
|
||||
|
|
@ -552,7 +574,8 @@ class LockHandler(object):
|
|||
evalstring, func_tup, raw_string = self.locks[access_type]
|
||||
# execute all lock funcs in the correct order, producing a tuple of True/False results.
|
||||
true_false = tuple(
|
||||
bool(tup[0](accessing_obj, self.obj, *tup[1], **tup[2])) for tup in func_tup
|
||||
bool(tup[0](accessing_obj, self.obj, *tup[1], **tup[2]))
|
||||
for tup in func_tup
|
||||
)
|
||||
# the True/False tuple goes into evalstring, which combines them
|
||||
# with AND/OR/NOT in order to get the final result.
|
||||
|
|
@ -571,11 +594,18 @@ class LockHandler(object):
|
|||
|
||||
"""
|
||||
evalstring, func_tup, raw_string = locks[access_type]
|
||||
true_false = tuple(tup[0](accessing_obj, self.obj, *tup[1], **tup[2]) for tup in func_tup)
|
||||
true_false = tuple(
|
||||
tup[0](accessing_obj, self.obj, *tup[1], **tup[2]) for tup in func_tup
|
||||
)
|
||||
return eval(evalstring % true_false)
|
||||
|
||||
def check_lockstring(
|
||||
self, accessing_obj, lockstring, no_superuser_bypass=False, default=False, access_type=None
|
||||
self,
|
||||
accessing_obj,
|
||||
lockstring,
|
||||
no_superuser_bypass=False,
|
||||
default=False,
|
||||
access_type=None,
|
||||
):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Do a direct check against a lockstring ('atype:func()..'),
|
||||
|
|
@ -614,7 +644,8 @@ class LockHandler(object):
|
|||
or (
|
||||
hasattr(accessing_obj, "get_account")
|
||||
and (
|
||||
not accessing_obj.get_account() or accessing_obj.get_account().is_superuser
|
||||
not accessing_obj.get_account()
|
||||
or accessing_obj.get_account().is_superuser
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
):
|
||||
|
|
@ -633,7 +664,8 @@ class LockHandler(object):
|
|||
# if no access types was given and multiple locks were
|
||||
# embedded in the lockstring we assume all must be true
|
||||
return all(
|
||||
self._eval_access_type(accessing_obj, locks, access_type) for access_type in locks
|
||||
self._eval_access_type(accessing_obj, locks, access_type)
|
||||
for access_type in locks
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -647,7 +679,11 @@ class _ObjDummy:
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
def check_lockstring(
|
||||
accessing_obj, lockstring, no_superuser_bypass=False, default=False, access_type=None
|
||||
accessing_obj,
|
||||
lockstring,
|
||||
no_superuser_bypass=False,
|
||||
default=False,
|
||||
access_type=None,
|
||||
):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Do a direct check against a lockstring ('atype:func()..'),
|
||||
|
|
@ -738,7 +774,10 @@ def _test():
|
|||
|
||||
# obj1.locks.add("edit:attr(test)")
|
||||
|
||||
print("comparing obj2.permissions (%s) vs obj1.locks (%s)" % (obj2.permissions, obj1.locks))
|
||||
print(
|
||||
"comparing obj2.permissions (%s) vs obj1.locks (%s)"
|
||||
% (obj2.permissions, obj1.locks)
|
||||
)
|
||||
print(obj1.locks.check(obj2, "owner"))
|
||||
print(obj1.locks.check(obj2, "edit"))
|
||||
print(obj1.locks.check(obj2, "examine"))
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -38,7 +38,9 @@ class TestLockCheck(EvenniaTest):
|
|||
self.assertEqual(True, self.obj1.locks.check(self.obj2, "get"))
|
||||
self.obj1.locks.add("get:false()")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(False, self.obj1.locks.check(self.obj2, "get"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(True, self.obj1.locks.check(self.obj2, "not_exist", default=True))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
True, self.obj1.locks.check(self.obj2, "not_exist", default=True)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestLockfuncs(EvenniaTest):
|
||||
|
|
@ -144,7 +146,9 @@ class TestLockfuncs(EvenniaTest):
|
|||
self.assertEqual(False, lockfuncs.id(self.obj2, None, "%s" % (dbref + "1")))
|
||||
dbref = self.account2.dbref
|
||||
self.assertEqual(True, lockfuncs.pdbref(self.account2, None, "%s" % dbref))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(False, lockfuncs.pid(self.account2, None, "%s" % (dbref + "1")))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
False, lockfuncs.pid(self.account2, None, "%s" % (dbref + "1"))
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_attr(self):
|
||||
self.obj2.db.testattr = 45
|
||||
|
|
@ -156,7 +160,9 @@ class TestLockfuncs(EvenniaTest):
|
|||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(True, lockfuncs.objattr(None, self.obj2, "testattr", "45"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(True, lockfuncs.objattr(None, self.obj2, "testattr", "45"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(False, lockfuncs.objattr(None, self.obj2, "testattr", "45", compare="lt"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
False, lockfuncs.objattr(None, self.obj2, "testattr", "45", compare="lt")
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_locattr(self):
|
||||
self.obj2.location.db.locattr = "test"
|
||||
|
|
@ -186,7 +192,13 @@ class TestLockfuncs(EvenniaTest):
|
|||
|
||||
@override_settings(IRC_ENABLED=True, TESTVAL=[1, 2, 3])
|
||||
def test_serversetting(self):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(True, lockfuncs.serversetting(None, None, "IRC_ENABLED", "True"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(True, lockfuncs.serversetting(None, None, "TESTVAL", "[1, 2, 3]"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(False, lockfuncs.serversetting(None, None, "TESTVAL", "[1, 2, 4]"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
True, lockfuncs.serversetting(None, None, "IRC_ENABLED", "True")
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
True, lockfuncs.serversetting(None, None, "TESTVAL", "[1, 2, 3]")
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
False, lockfuncs.serversetting(None, None, "TESTVAL", "[1, 2, 4]")
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(False, lockfuncs.serversetting(None, None, "TESTVAL", "123"))
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue