Make entire wiki compile; still with many errors

This commit is contained in:
Griatch 2020-06-06 19:38:34 +02:00
parent 17dfb93b32
commit 13df0adebf
74 changed files with 395 additions and 317 deletions

View file

@ -22,15 +22,15 @@ This would help in development to quickly refer to where a resource is located.
### Kovitikus (Sept. 11, 2019)
[Batch Code](https://github.com/evennia/evennia/wiki/Batch-code-processor) should have a link in the developer area. It is currently only listed in the tutorials section as an afterthought to a tutorial title.
[Batch Code](Batch-Code-Processor) should have a link in the developer area. It is currently only listed in the tutorials section as an afterthought to a tutorial title.
***
In regards to the general structure of each wiki page: I'd like to see a table of contents at the top of each one, so that it can be quickly navigated and is immediately apparent what sections are covered on the page. Similar to the current [Getting Started](https://github.com/evennia/evennia/wiki/Getting-Started) page.
In regards to the general structure of each wiki page: I'd like to see a table of contents at the top of each one, so that it can be quickly navigated and is immediately apparent what sections are covered on the page. Similar to the current [Getting Started](Getting-Started) page.
***
The structuring of the page should also include a quick reference cheatsheet for certain aspects. Such as [Tags](https://github.com/evennia/evennia/wiki/Tags) including a quick reference section at the top that lists an example of every available method you can use in a clear and consistent format, along with a comment. Readers shouldn't have to decipher the article to gather such basic information and it should instead be available at first glance.
The structuring of the page should also include a quick reference cheatsheet for certain aspects. Such as [Tags](Tags) including a quick reference section at the top that lists an example of every available method you can use in a clear and consistent format, along with a comment. Readers shouldn't have to decipher the article to gather such basic information and it should instead be available at first glance.
Example of a quick reference:
@ -92,4 +92,4 @@ If I want to find information on the correct syntax for is_typeclass(), here's w
* Ctrl+F in my IDE. Results.
* Fortunately, there's only one result for def is_typeclass. If this was at_look, there would be several results, and I'd have to go through each of those individually, and most of them would just call return_appearance
An important part of a refactor, in my opinion, is separating out the "Tutorials" from the "Reference" documentation.
An important part of a refactor, in my opinion, is separating out the "Tutorials" from the "Reference" documentation.